Saturday, June 12. 2010Highly Misleading Press Release by Oxford University Press JournalsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Uptake for OUP's pricey "Oxford Open (OO)" paid hybrid-Gold OA option is likely going to decrase further after their recent 40% increase in Open Access Publication Charges, effective from December 2009, for authors from subscribing institutions, cf. http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0910/msg00076.html
This clearly foils their promise to lower OUP journal subscription costs proportionately, as hybrid Gold uptake increases. |
QuicksearchMaterials You Are Invited To Use To Promote OA Self-Archiving:
Videos:
The American Scientist Open Access Forum has been chronicling and often directing the course of progress in providing Open Access to Universities' Peer-Reviewed Research Articles since its inception in the US in 1998 by the American Scientist, published by the Sigma Xi Society. The Forum is largely for policy-makers at universities, research institutions and research funding agencies worldwide who are interested in institutional Open Acess Provision policy. (It is not a general discussion group for serials, pricing or publishing issues: it is specifically focussed on institutional Open Acess policy.)
You can sign on to the Forum here.
ArchivesCalendar
CategoriesBlog AdministrationStatisticsLast entry: 2018-09-14 13:27
1129 entries written
238 comments have been made
Top Referrers |